<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://blog.isavoir.com/feed/rss2/xslt" ?><rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>DNA MANIA - Scholarship</title>
  <link>http://blog.isavoir.com/</link>
  <description>Bioinformatic, Text Mining, Biological Text Mining, Name entity recognition, Genomic, System Biology, Semantic, Computational Biology, Semantic Web, Knowledge management, Biomedicine, Ontology, Thesaurus, Terminology, Corpora, Content management</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:58:56 +0200</pubDate>
  <copyright>iSavoir @ 2007 copyright reserved</copyright>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Dotclear</generator>
  
    
  <item>
    <title>How Google Books Search can change Academic Science</title>
    <link>http://blog.isavoir.com/post/2007/03/23/How-Google-Book-Search-can-change-Academic-Science</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:f27622b95a31ca5fa550df4a95bcd7d9</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:17:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Frédéric</dc:creator>
        <category>Open Science</category>
        <category>Education</category><category>Scholarship</category>    
    <description>    &lt;p&gt;In a follow-up from this post i've picked up: &lt;a href=&quot;http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/03/how_google_book.html&quot; hreflang=&quot;eng&quot;&gt;O'Reilly radar&lt;/a&gt; , here's the future of Scholarship and education, I
truly think.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google Books Serch has been undoubtedly useful but, they don't seem to be
digitising classic books in law, medicine and various sciences, which are very
famous and now in public domain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, publishers who have transcribed and published them, have put in
Google Books where only few pages/lines can be accessed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Books are horribly expensive, especially classic legal tomes, which have a
smaller market than computer books, to make it economically viable for
companies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the same post, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://landscape.blogspot.com/2007/03/how-google-books-is-changing-academic.html&quot; hreflang=&quot;eng&quot;&gt;Berkeley grad student disses the experience of the Berkeley
library system and lauds Google&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;quot; Jo Guldi, the author of that blog entry,
wrote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was idle trying a search on &amp;quot;roads&amp;quot; to see what sort of a literature would
turn up for the period of my dissertation research, 1740-1850.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I didn't expect much. I've spent the last two years wandering through the
Yale, Harvard, and California libraries, the British Library, Britain's
National Archives, and the immense reserves of North American Inter Library
Loan reading every book on London, pavement, or travel I could get my hands
on.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For academic historians , this is turbo chargingwith online access to full
text book.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What about books in Sciences, law, medicine and technologies , Mr Google
?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
          <comments>http://blog.isavoir.com/post/2007/03/23/How-Google-Book-Search-can-change-Academic-Science#comment-form</comments>
      <wfw:comment>http://blog.isavoir.com/post/2007/03/23/How-Google-Book-Search-can-change-Academic-Science#comment-form</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://blog.isavoir.com/feed/rss2/comments/90873</wfw:commentRss>
      </item>
    
</channel>
</rss>